Mini-Case Analysis: H1N1
Listen
ReadSpeaker webReader: Listen
Focus
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin®
Turnitin® enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.
Instructions
Consider the H1N1 influenza or swine flu outbreak of 2009. Read Mitigation Approaches to Combat the Flu Pandemic to learn more about mitigation strategies that have been employed in the past and then write a short case analysis addressing the following questions:
How do the biological characteristics of airborne diseases impact their transmission?
What strategies have been employed?
Are some strategies more effective than others? Why?
For additional details, please refer to the Mini Case Analysis Guidelines and Rubric document.
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Mini-Case Analysis Rubric
Print Rubric
This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.
Criteria
Exemplary
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Criterion Score
Biological Characteristics of Airborne Diseases
45 points
Meets Proficient and supports explanation with course concepts
40.5 points
Explains how the biological characteristics of airborne diseases impact their transmission
31.5 points
Incompletely explains how the biological characteristics of airborne diseases impact their transmission
0 points
Does not accurately explain how the biological characteristics of airborne diseases impact their transmission
Score of Biological Characteristics of Airborne Diseases, / 45 Criterion score has been overridden
Strategies for Mitigating Disease Risk
45 points
Meets Proficient and discussion regarding strategies is particularly insightful or supported with examples, course concepts, and resources
40.5 points
Describes and compares the strategies employed to determine efficacy
31.5 points
Briefly or incompletely describes and compares the strategies employed to determine efficacy
0 points
Does not describe or compare the strategies employed to determine efficacy
Score of Strategies for Mitigating Disease Risk, / 45 Criterion score has been overridden
Articulation of Response
10 points
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format
9 points
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
7 points
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
0 points
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
Score of Articulation of Response, / 10 Criterion score has been overridden
Rubric Total Score
Total
Score of Mini-Case Analysis Rubric, / 100 Criterion score has been overridden
Overall Score
Overall Score
Points earned out of 100
91 points minimum
The overall submission earned 91 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
71 points minimum
The overall submission earned 71 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
1 point minimum
The overall submission earned 1 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
0 points minimum
The overall submission earned 0 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
