I need the case to be presented, and argued in favor of Camara. You are to pretend youre a defense lawyer, and give at least 3 reasons why the case should not stand. Give facts and details. The written presentations should address relevant facts in the case, including how the case arrived at the U.S. Supreme Court, the issue presented to the Court for resolution, and why the Court should find in favor of the advocate. In presenting the argument, the student should refer to other judicial precedents cited in the case under discussion, point out weaknesses in the opposition position, and convince the Court of the soundness of his/her own reasoning. In this regard, logic, common sense, and a familiarity with both the facts and law of the case will be essential for a successful presentation. The outline for the argument should generally be framed as follows: I. Introduction of student and who student represents (appellant or respondent) II. What result is sought from Court, i.e. affirm, reverse, etc. III. For Appellant only How case arrived at Supreme Court, i.e. progression from verdict to U.S. Supreme Court IV. Strongest 2-3 points favoring your position in the case with brief explanation V. Brief explanation of why your adversarys arguments should not be accepted VI. Conclusion with request again for your desired result Since the Weinreb case book is edited and does not contain complete U.S. Supreme Court Opinions, frequently the dissenting opinions are omitted. Students assigned to these presentations will be expected to read the entire Opinion, including dissents, to prepare for their argument. The entire opinion should be read online through one of the websites identified above.
